Tuesday, 3 November 2015

Shell’s claim on Niger Delta pollution “blatantly false” – Amnesty International


   Multi-national oil company, Shell, lied when it claimed it had cleaned up heavily polluted areas of the Niger Delta, Amnesty International and the Centre for Environment, Human Rights and Development (CEHRD) said in a new report published on Tuesday.

The report titled, “Clean it up: Shell’s false claims about oil spills in the Niger Delta”, documents ongoing contamination at four oil spill sites that Shell said it had cleaned up years ago.
Amnesty said the report was published to mark the 20th anniversary of the execution of the environmental activist and writer, Ken Saro-Wiwa.
Mr. Saro-Wiwa, who campaigned relentlessly against damage caused to the Ogoni area of Rivers State, was executed by the Sani Abacha junta on November 10, 1995.
“By inadequately cleaning up the pollution from its pipelines and wells, Shell is leaving thousands of women, men and children exposed to contaminated land, water and air, in some cases for years or even decades,” said Mark Dummett, Business and Human Rights researcher at Amnesty International.
“Oil spills have a devastating impact on the fields, forests and fisheries that the people of the Niger Delta depend on for their food and livelihood. Anyone who visits these spill sites can see and smell for themselves how the pollution has spread across the land,” he said.
The report also documents the failure of the Nigerian government to regulate the oil industry.
Its watchdog, the National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA), is under-resourced and continues to certify areas visibly polluted with crude oil, as clean, Amnesty said.
“As people in Nigeria and around the world remember Ken Saro-Wiwa and the eight other Ogoni leaders who were executed in 1995, Shell and the government of Nigeria cannot ignore the terrible legacy of the oil industry in the Niger Delta. For many people of the region, oil has brought nothing but misery,” said Stevyn Obodoekwe, CEHRD’s Director of Programmes.
“The quality of life of people living surrounded by oil fumes, oil encrusted soil and rivers awash with crude oil is appalling, and has been for decades,” he added.
AI said its investigation found visible pollution at sites Shell claimed it had cleaned.
“The Niger Delta is the biggest oil-producing region in Africa. The largest international oil company there is Shell. It operates around 50 oil fields and 5,000 km of pipelines, much of them ageing and poorly-maintained. The oil giant’s own figures admit to 1,693 oil spills since 2007, though the real number is probably higher,” AI said in a statement.
After a 2011 investigation by United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) exposed massive levels of pollution caused by oil spills from Shell pipelines in the Ogoniland as well as health risk the people in the region are exposed to as a result of Shell’s failure to clean up the spills, Shell promised to clean up sites identified by UNEP and improve its response to future spills.
According to AI, its investigation at four of the spill sites UNEP identified as highly polluted in 2011, revealed all four remain visibly contaminated even though Shell says it has cleaned them.
“The investigation demonstrates this is due to inadequate clean-up, and not new oil spills,” AI stated.
“At one of the locations, Shell’s Bomu Well 11, researchers found blackened soil and layers of oil on the water, 45 years after an oil spill took place – even though Shell claims to have cleaned it up twice, in 1975 and 2012. At other sites, certified as cleaned by the Nigerian regulator, researchers found soil and water contaminated by oil close to where people lived and farmed.
“The investigation shows Shell has not addressed problems with its entire approach to cleaning up oil pollution in Nigeria, including how it trains and oversees the local contractors that actually conduct the work,” the statement claimed.
AI said one contractor who had been hired by Shell told Amnesty International how half-hearted and superficial clean-up efforts failed to prevent lasting environmental damage.
“This is just a cover up. If you just dig down a few metres you find oil. We just excavated, then shifted the soil away, then covered it all up again,” the contractor was quoted as saying.
AI said when contacted, Shell disagreed with its findings but did not give further details.
“The company directed researchers to its website, but this provides very little information about clean up. Shell also repeated its claim that most oil spills and pollution are caused by illegal activity, such as people stealing oil from pipes rather than poor maintenance, the statement claimed.
“Amnesty International and CEHRD have exposed false statements made by Shell about illegal activity and the extent of oil spills due to corroded pipes in previous reports. In any case, Nigerian law says companies who own pipelines are responsible for cleaning up, no matter what causes a spill,” the statement said.
Amnesty International called on the Nigerian government to strengthen its watchdog, the National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA). It also ask Shell to be more transparent with the clean-up it claimed to be doing.
”Shell says theft is to blame for oil spills, but even if that were true it would not excuse the company’s consistent failure to clean up oil pollution. Shell’s blame game can no longer deflect attention from its broken promises and neglected infrastructure,” said Mark Dummett.

“As long as oil companies fail to live up to their commitments, the Niger Delta will remain a cautionary tale of communities promised prosperity, but left with blighted, devastated lands.”Bonga oil spill3





Ebola survivor, Dr. Ada Igonoh delivered of a baby girl

The only female doctor to survive Nigeria’s Ebola outbreak, Dr Ada Igonoh has given birth to a healthy baby girl in the United States of America (USA).
Dr. Ada with her baby
Dr. Ada with her baby
Dr Igonoh’s daughter was born on November 3, 2015, at the Greater El-Monte Community Hospital in California.
She had been placed under surveillance since the baby was conceived to ensure a hitch-free birth.
He baby was certified Ebola-free upon delivery.
Dr Igonoh was working at the First Consultant Medical Centre (FCMC) in Obalende, Lagos when Nigeria’s index patient, Liberian Patrick Sawyer was admitted at the facility.

BREAKING: Popular Lekki supermarket, Prince Ebeano on fire [PHOTOS]


fire2 (1)

Reports reaching DAILY POST indicates that Prince Ebeano Supermarket in Lekki Phase 1, Lagos is currently on fire.
It is however not clear what led to the fire incident.
Men of the state Fire Services are said to be heading to the scene of the inferno.


fire4
       
        
       fire5
       

Activision Blizzard acquires Candy Crush for $5.9bn

Candy Crush
US computer game company Activision Blizzard, which produces World of Warcraft and Call of Duty, is buying King Digital Entertainment, the creator of Candy Crush Saga in a deal is worth $5.9bn (£3.8bn).

Activision said the acquisition would make it a global leader in interactive entertainment across mobile, console and PC platforms.
It added the combined firm would have more than half a billion monthly active users in 196 countries.
The Call of Duty series is one of the world’s best selling console games, while Candy Crush Saga is among the most popular games on mobile devices.
Video game publishers are switching from the physical sale of games to digital growth as consumers move from consoles to playing on smartphones and tablets.
Wider appeal
In a statement, Activision Blizzard chief executive Bobby Kotick said: “With a combined global network of more than half a billion monthly active users, our potential to reach audiences around the world on the device of their choosing enables us to deliver great games to even bigger audiences than ever before.”
Mr Kotick told the Reuters news agency that the company wanted to broaden its reach and appeal to a larger demographic.
He said that 60% of King Digital Entertainment’s players were female, and that no games console or hardware, besides a smartphone, was needed to access its games.
King Digital Entertainment has focused on a business model that allows users to play a game for free, but pay extra for additional features.
Analysis: Leo Kelion, BBC Technology desk editor
Candy Crush describes itself as the “sweetest game around” – but even so there’s no guarantee that the
$5.9bn (£3.8bn) takeover of King.com won’t leave both investors and players with a bitter taste.
The big-budget, action-centric PC and console titles that Californian buyer Activision Blizzard is best known for are quite different to the more simple puzzle and role-playing mobile and web-based games its Stockholm and London-headquartered acquisition is skilled at making.
Furthermore, the size of the acquisition dwarfs other mega-deals in an industry already prone to consolidation.
For comparison’s sake, other recent mergers include:
Microsoft’s $2.5bn purchase of Minecraft’s developer Mojang
Facebook’s $2bn takeover of virtual reality headset-maker Oculus
Amazon’s $970m acquisition of the games community Twitch
Electronic Art’s $750m payment for Plants v Zombies developer PopCap
Asia reach
The international success of Candy Crush Saga has given it exposure to high growth markets in Asia, such as China, Japan and South Korea.
Activision’s games are played on more expensive video game consoles or computers, with games costing between £20-£40.
King Digital Entertainment, which has its main offices in London and Stockholm, will continue to operate as an independent unit led by chief executive Riccardo Zacconi.
Mr Zacconi said: “Since 2003, we have built one of the largest player networks on mobile and Facebook, with 474 million monthly active users in the third quarter 2015.”
We believe that the acquisition will position us very well for the next phase of our company’s evolution.”
Activision Blizzard is offering $18 (£11.66) in cash for each King share, and the deal is expected to boost Activision’s earnings by about 30%.
King Digital Entertainment floated on the New York Stock Exchange in March last year with the original share price being offered at $22.50 (£14.60).
In early trade in New York its share price went up 14% to $17.72.
‘Global hit’
Candy Crush Saga, which was first launched on Facebook and smartphones in 2012, caught the public imagination and still makes up about a third of the company’s revenue.
Even though the company has produced more than 200 games, including the popular Bubble Witch and Farm Heroes, it has yet to repeat the success it found with Candy Crush Saga.
“Candy Crush Saga was such a massive global hit, it’s a very difficult challenge to replicate that even if they release sequels or expansions to the original theme or release new titles,” said Piers Harding-Rolls, Head of Games at IHS Technology. “The share price reflects that.”
“It’s a big move by Activision who have gained access to an audience that does not overlap with its existing market, particularly in Asia,” Mr Harding-Rolls added.
Fast-growing market
King Digital Entertainment helped boost its number of daily active users with the launch of Candy Crush Soda Saga in late 2014, but there has been a decline in player spending on their number one game.
Analyst, Eric Opara at Edison Investment Research said the deal made sense for both companies.
“For Activision, it will provide a step-change in its penetration of the mobile gaming channel, which is the fastest growing segment of the video games market.”
“For King, it offers the potential to leverage its mobile and social gaming expertise across Activision’s large games portfolio and reduces its reliance on its own blockbuster games like Candy Crush,” he said.
The deal is expected to be completed by the second quarter of 2016, assuming approval from shareholders and regulators.





Shell accused of lying over Nigeria oil spill clean-up


Thirteen out of 15 areas visited between July and September this year were still 'visibly polluted,' according to a new report..{GP}


Shell has been accused of making false claims about the extent of its oil spill clean-up operations in Nigeria and urged to take more action to help worst-hit communities.
Amnesty International and the Centre for Environment, Human Rights and Development (CEHRD) charged the oil major with failing to implement recommendations from a critical 2011 UN report.
Amnesty and the CEHRD's claims come in a new report, "Clean It Up: Shell's False Claims about Oil Spill Response in the Niger Delta".
The 38-page document said most of the recommendations of a UN Environment Programme (UNEP) report had not been implemented since its publication five years ago.
Thirteen out of 15 areas visited between July and September this year were still "visibly polluted" or contaminated, despite claims to the contrary by Shell and the government.
The inadequate clean up left thousands of people "exposed to contaminated land, water and air, in some cases for years or even decades," said Amnesty researcher Mark Dummett.
The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria (SPDC) said it rejected the groups' claims.
The SPDC said it was "committed to the implementation of the UNEP report".
It had "initiated action on all the recommendations addressed directly to it," it added.
"We disagree with the assertions made with regard to implementation ... and would like to reiterate that we have consistently and publicly reported our actions in this regard as well as highlighted ongoing challenges of crude oil theft and illegal refining," the SPDC said.
Saro-Wiwa execution
The claims come a week before the 20th anniversary of the execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa, who helped bring the extent of oil-related ecological damage in Nigeria to the world's attention.
Wiwa and eight community leaders from Nigeria's southern Ogoniland area were hanged on November 10, 1995 after being convicted at a secret trial of murdering four local chiefs.
Nigeria's then military government ignored pleas for clemency from world leaders.
Special vigils and protests outside Shell petrol stations are planned in the run-up to next week's anniversary, Amnesty said on Tuesday.
But campaigners said communities in the creeks and marshes of Nigeria's oil-producing southern delta region were facing the same problems Wiwa highlighted two decades ago.
"Twenty years; nothing has been done," Fyneface Dumnamene Fyneface, a human rights and environmental activist from Port Harcourt, said in a statement.
"Ogoniland is still polluted ... no clean-up has been done ... justice has not been achieved. Twenty years and what they fought for has not been addressed. That cannot continue."


Understanding the Difficult Fight Against Boko Haram






Nigerian demonstrators in London trying to raise awareness of Boko Haram after a four-day massacre by the group that killed around 2,000 people. Photo by Jake Lewis
According to a study released earlier this year, fighting associated with Boko Haram killed over 6,300 civilians in 2014 alone. The Islamic extremist group—whose name is often translated as "Western education is a sin"—was founded in Nigeria in 2002 and is now active in Niger, Chad, and northern Cameroon, with its violent insurgency displacingaround 2.3 million people since 2013.
Understanding the group and how to deal with them is arduous, but Virginia Comolli—a security and development researcher for the International Institute for Strategic Studies—recently released a book, Boko Haram: Nigeria's Islamist Insurgency, seeking to do just that. I gave her a ring to talk about her work.
VICE: First off, how did Boko Haram arise?
Virginia Comolli: Officially, they emerged in the early 2000s. However, they are hardly a new occurrence for the northeastern part of Nigeria. This region of the world has a long history of violent, religious extremists, particularly the northeastern part of Nigeria. During the post-colonial period, several of these groups emerged. The most infamous are [Yan Tatsine, led by the Islamic preacher] Maitatsine, who launched large-scale riots in Kano in the 1980s. Boko Haram merges out of this tradition, very much seeding the many socio-economic and political grievances that are still pretty widespread in that part of Nigeria.
During the initial years you could describe them as an isolated, mainly non-violent sect, leading very secluded lives, not mixing with mainstream Muslims. What we see now, from 2009 to 2010, is a group that is capable of waging a large-scale insurgency against the state, that engages in terrorist attacks and that relies on a variety of criminal activity to sustain itself.
Boko Haram manages to recruit both the poverty-stricken and the well-educated. How do you think they manage to appeal to such disparate groups? It's very important you make this assertion, because often people wrongly equate poverty with extremism, claiming people with no economic opportunity would automatically turn to violent or criminal groups. But that is often not the case. Evidence suggests that, during the early days, wealthy, educated individuals—children of the Nigerian middle-class—would actually join the movement. And of course, people from less wealthy backgrounds would join also, attracted by economic opportunities.
The original leader, Mohammed Yusuf, was a very wealthy man, and by offering some money in the form of micro-loans, which people could use to set up small businesses, he appealed to many individuals. He was also a very charismatic creature, so it wasn't just the economic opportunities he was offering, but [also] the ideology and teachings. We've seen this trend change quite a bit over time, and I think it's safe to say the vast majority who join tend to be people with limited economic opportunities.
Besides the ideological appeal that might still exist among some members, it's basically by joining a group like Boko Haram [that] young, usually male, [members have] the opportunity all of a sudden to feel like they are someone. They are somebody. They belong to a group, given a gown and a wife, which is one of the reasons why so many females have been kidnapped—they were forced to become wives. And they also find a way of channeling whatever grievances they feel towards the state.
These are the same drivers that were behind earlier violent groups, who all framed their discourse into religious terms, but they were also trying to use and exploit the feeling of socio-economic marginalization and anger towards widespread corruption that is prominent in the northeast, as well as the feeling of neglect from the federal government.
So you wouldn't say that all members hold radical Islamic beliefs?Boko Haram is a very fluid and non-monolithic group. People there may fully or partly espouse the violent radical ideology, truly believing that the groups should fight for the establishment of an Islamic state in Nigeria. And for some, it's because of lack of alternative opportunities, political grievances, or simply because they seek revenge for instances where they've been wrongly targeted by security forces.
Often the Nigerian security forces have been responsible for widespread human rights violations, and arguably the actions of the military, at times, have exacerbated the violence and created a vicious cycle that has escalated recruitment for Boko Haram.
READ ON VICE NEWS: Nigerian Army Raids Boko Haram Camps, Rescuing More Than 300 People
Muhammadu Buhari, who has a poor history of human rights abuses and is a known disciplinarian, came back into power earlier this year after ruling the country for a time in the 1980s. How do you think he's going to manage the task of fighting Boko Haram?Buhari unfortunately inherited a long list of challenges from the political scene in terms of the economy and security, which is also to do with the middle belt, where there's been a resurgence of Biafra separatist sentiment.
Boko Haram is the number one priority. This was made clear during his election campaign. He said he would ensure that they would feel the full force of the Nigerian military. And one of the first few initiatives he implemented when he took office was to change all the heads of the armed forces and to relocate the 7th Division—the army division responsible for the counter-insurgency operations—to Maiduguri, the capital city of Borno State, where Boko Haram operate.
Buhari has a history of being very authoritarian. During his first time in office in the 80s, his administration was marred by a number of human rights violations. It was very telling that this time round, even during his short inaugural speech, he devoted a couple of lines to the issue of human rights violations. This was a very important step, because the previous administration, the Jonathan administration [often denied abuses], despite all the reports published by the likes of Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and others, who provided evidence of human rights violations conducted by the security forces.
Buhari acknowledged that the abuses had taken place and made it clear that this culture of impunity that had been allowed to flourish would no longer be tolerated.
Buhari jailed around 500 politicians and officials in a clean-up attempt, didn't he?Yes. He feels very strongly about the need to eradicate corruption, and it's very much needed, as it's had an impact on fueling Boko Haram's recruitment drive and also in undermining the military efforts. The defense budgets have increased annually for the past several years, however there's been many instances where soldiers on the front line had complained or had to run away because they were not supplied with sufficient weaponry.

Related: Watch VICE News' film 'The War Against Boko Haram'

What's the best antidote to such an adaptable group?Adaptable is a perfect way to describe them. We've seen it on so many levels in the way they've changed their tactics, their operation theaters, their funding revenues, always trying to find a better way to adapt to a changing situation and catch security off-guard.
I think you need a very much multi-layered approach. Of course, you need the security and the defense component so you can create some form of safety and stability. Once some level of security has been re-established, a continuation of it needs to be carried out in parallel with other projects, such as economic rejuvenation, which is very much needed across the north, particularly the northeast, where the highest percentage of people in severe poverty are.
Programs in education need to improve. I'm not simply talking about reopening the schools that have been shut for over a year now, but also improving the quality of the teaching in those schools.
Then, a pet hate of mine is the issue of lack of electricity supply. That's a problem that affects the whole of Nigeria, but of course you cannot start even a small business if you don't have a reliable electricity supply. We're talking about infrastructural weaknesses that need to be addressed in order for the region and country to develop, and move forward to face the challenges it is facing.
Thanks, Virginia.
'Boko Haram: Nigeria's Islamist Insurgency' is available here.

Husband batters wife to death, flees in Enugu

A man, Charles Oyibo, is currently on the run in Enugu after beating his wife, Angela, to death.
It was learnt that the beating took place on September 30, at Aku, in Igbo-Etiti Local Government Area of Enugu State.
It was also gathered that on the fateful day, Charles pummeled his wife, Angela, over a yet to be ascertained matter, leaving her unconscious.
The woman was rushed to an undisclosed hospital, but she was not able to regain full consciousness, until she died on October 22.
Our correspondent gathered that the husband, Charles, ran away immediately his wife, Angela, was confirmed dead.
The spokesman for the Enugu State Police Command, Mr. Ebere Amaraizu, who confirmed the development, said preliminary investigations revealed that the husband, Charles, was in the habit of beating his wife.
Amaraizu said the police had started hunting for Charles.
He said the man would be brought to book.